Preposterous Guru

Renewable Nanophilosophy

New Bee Strain Offers Hope to Humanity

A British man claims to have bred a strain of bee capable of protecting itself from a deadly parasite that is wiping out the environmentally vital insect. The British Beekeepers' Association, which represents 18,000 beekeepers, yesterday described the work as ''exciting''.

Ron Hoskins, a 79-year-old former heating engineer from Swindon, Wilts., described the situation as ''serious' and warned that ''if the bees die, we die''.

Mr Hoskins lost tens of thousands of bees after the parasitic varroa mite entered Britain in 1992. The mite poses a threat to mankind because the billions of bees it kills world-wide are crucial to pollinating crops and plants. The varroa mite entered Britain in 1992 and spread across the country, killing millions of bees. The mite lays eggs on bee larvae, which suck their blood and stunt the growth of their wings so they can't fly. They also attach to the necks of adult bees and sap their strength.

A survey released in May 2010 by the British Beekeepers' Association revealed that beekepers lost 17 per cent of their colonies in the last year.

Mr Hoskins has carried out research on his colonies for 18 years, has isolated and is breeding a strain of bees which groom each other to remove the mites. He is now taking sperm from these bees and artificially inseminating queens from other hives to allow the new breed to spread through Britain.

He said: ''What I want to do is redevelop the British bee so that it can protect itself against these varroa mites. If all the bees in the world die out then we die out - the situation is really that serious. Humans are reliant on completely reliant on bees for pollinating crops and plants which produce oxygen. We are hoping that drones from my 'grooming' bees will mate with wandering female virgin queens and spread the footprint across Britain. This is not a short term solution and it will take a lot of work but it could be our only hope of saving the bee.''

(Telegraph)

Posted August 27, 2010
// 0 Comments

Universe "Will Expand Forever" - NASA

The universe will continue to expand forever, Nasa scientists concluded in a new study that sheds light on one of the greatest astronomical puzzles, "dark energy".  Space agency researchers used the Hubble Space Telescope to "narrow in" on what they believe comprises the energy, which pushes our universe apart at ever-increasing speed.

Discovered it in 1998, astronomers have been unable to say what the mysterious force is, except that it is invisible and makes up a "large chunk of our universe", or 72 per cent of its size.

Almost a quarter, 24 per cent, is thought to be "dark matter", which is also mysterious but easier to study than dark energy because of its "gravitational influence". The rest of the universe, a mere four per cent, is made of "the stuff that makes up people, planets, stars and everything made up of atoms".

By using the huge "galactic magnifying lens" the international team of scientists, led by Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, concluded the distribution of dark energy would mean the universe would never stop growing.
The study, published in the journal Science on Thursday, also found it would eventually become a dead and cold wasteland. The scientists used Hubble and European Space Observatory's Very Large Telescope to observe how light from distant stars became distorted around a nearby cluster of galaxies called Abell 1689.

The galaxies, found in the constellation of Virgo, is one of the biggest galactic clusters known to science.

Due to its huge mass, scientists say it "acts as a cosmic magnifying glass", causing light to bend around it.

"We have to tackle the dark energy problem from all sides," said Prof Eric Jullo, a JPL scientist who led the international study. "It's important to have several methods, and now we've got a new, very powerful one.

"What I like about our new method is that it's very visual. You can literally see gravitation and dark energy bend the images of the background galaxies into arcs."

He said the study's conclusion meant scientists could say for the first time that the expansion of the universe "will continue to accelerate and the universe will expand forever".

Priya Natarajan, a cosmologist at Yale University, who was part of the team, added: "We can now apply our technique to other gravitational lenses.
(Telegraph)

Posted August 20, 2010
// 0 Comments

UK Beavers Breed in Wild

The first beavers born in the wild since their re-introduction to the UK last year have been spotted. Beavers were a native species to the UK and were once common before they were hunted to extinction by man. At least two young kits belonging to different family groups have been seen in Knapdale Forest in Mid Argyll.

The animals, estimated to be eight weeks old, were taken to Scotland from Norway last year as part of the Scottish Beaver Trial.

Beavers were hunted to extinction in the UK 400 years ago, although some feral beavers are known to exist in the wild as a result of being released by people who owned them as pets.
''Seeing the trial's new-born beaver kits was really amazing,'' said Christian Robstad, the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland's beaver field officer. "After weeks of patient observation, we were finally rewarded with not just one kit being spotted but a second kit from a different family group as well. The first emerged as part of a 'family outing' with its parents and older sister close by to offer additional protection. It kept close to the edge of the loch and called out to its family for reassurance while it began to learn to forage for food.''

The reintroduction is a partnership between the society and the Scottish Wildlife Trust.

Simon Jones, Scottish beaver trial project manager with the trust, said the kits marked a ''fantastic step forward'' for the trial.

He said: ''There is a chance that even more kits have been born this year. We will be tracking our animals closely and hope to determine the exact number of kits produced as part of the trial soon.''

The trial aims to provide information which could determine whether or not animals are reintroduced into the wild across Scotland.

Roseanna Cunningham, Scottish Environment Minister, said: ''It's exciting to see these beavers thriving in Knapdale Forest and producing beaver kits so soon after their reintroduction.

''We were hoping that this would happen and I'm looking forward to watching the progress of the beaver families over the coming years.''

The kits are currently about the size of a large guinea pig and weigh about one pound at birth.
(Telegraph)

Posted August 13, 2010
// 0 Comments

Why Some People Can Sleep Through Noise: Spindles

Some people can sleep through anything because their brains are capable of "fending off" noise, according to a new study. Researchers have found that heavy sleepers are able to block outside noise getting to their brains and lead to undisturbed sleep.

The discovery of the system, which only works at night and is equivalent to shutting your eyes, could lead to the development of "chemical" earplugs - drugs that block out noise during sleep. Researchers analysing brainwaves found that the mind produces pulses called "spindles" during sleep - which seem to protect the consciousness from noise. People who produce more spindles are less likely to wake up when exposed to any form of noise, the study found.

Dr Jeffrey Ellenbogen, assistant professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, said: "Noise-induced sleep disruption is one of the most common complaints that people have for why they have difficulty sleeping.

"I hear about this problem from hospitalised patients, hotel patrons and even healthy people in their home life. Given that the brain already has a mechanism in place to reduce the impact of noises on the sleeping brain, my laboratory is seeking to understand how the brain achieves that block and what we can do to enhance this naturally occurring protection of sleep from noises."

The authors looked at electroencephalography (EEG) patterns in the brain, which are used to distinguish stages of sleep. In the second and third stages, slow brain waves - which occur when we are not awake - were interspersed with brief rapid pulses - known as spindles. Previous research has found that the brain activity producing spindles, which only occur during sleep, kept sensory information from passing through an area of the brain known as the thalamus.

Electrical signals pass through the thalamus on the way to the cortex, where sounds are perceived by the mind - so if the signals are stopped in the thalamus, the person does not become aware of the noise. A total of 12 adults spent three nights under observation, with EEG readings being taken constantly. The first night was spent in quiet conditions, with the subsequent two involving increasing levels of sound.

The results revealed that each person kept a consistent spindle rate - the same on each night, regardless of decibel levels - and that those with higher rates were less likely to be disturbed on the noisy nights. Participants often were not aware that their sleep had been interrupted - indicating that environmental noise can have a greater impact on sleep quality than an individual may realise, the researchers said.

The report appears in the journal Current Biology.

( Telegraph)

Posted August 9, 2010
// 0 Comments

Pesticides Linked to Bee Decline

Government and retailers are under pressure to impose a ban on sale of pesticides linked to bee population decline following new research which groups call a 'growing body of evidence'.

Environmental groups including the Soil Association and Buglife are making a renewed call for an end to the use of neonicotinoid pesticides, which are among the most commonly used pesticides worldwide, after a new study linked them to a decline in bee in bee populations.
The study, published in the journal Toxicology, says the effects on bees of two particular neonicotinoid pesticides, known as imidacloprid and thiacloprid, have previously been underestimated and may explain the decline in bee populations.

It says even low concentrations of the pesticides may be more deadly then previously thought due to their high persistence in soil and water, supporting claims for the role that pesticides may play in bee deaths.

'The acceptable limits are based mainly on short-term tests. If long-term studies were to be carried out, far lower concentrations may turn out to be hazardous. This explains why minute quantities of imidacloprid may induce bee decline in the long run,' says study author Dr. Henk Tennekes.

Calls for a ban

Buglife campaigner Vicky Kindemba has welcomed the new research, saying it adds support to calls for a suspension in the use of the pesticides in the UK.

'This new information adds to the growing body of evidence that neonicotinoid pesticides are very harmful and even at extremely low levels in our environment they could still negatively impact on UK wildlife including pollinators, soil organisms and aquatic invertebrates,' Kindemba said.

The Soil Association said other products containing the pesticides  should also be withdrawn from general sale in UK supermarkets, hardware stores and garden centres.

'If the honeybee disappeared off the surface of the globe forever we'd be facing up to an unimaginable food crisis,' said a spokesperson. 'This latest research only adds to the evidence that is already strong enough to justify an immediate ban on neonicotinoids today.'

The campaign group has written to the chief executives of B&Q, Wilkinson's and Wyevale asking them to withdraw any products containing neonicotinoid pesticides from their store.

Government disregards warning

Responding to the new study, Defra said the UK would not be following some other EU countries in restricting the use of neonicotinoids.

'This research highlights a need for more data on long-term risks to bee health. We have already been considering this and pesticide companies will soon need to provide this data under new EU rules.

'We will keep this area under review and will not hesitate to act if there is any evidence of an unacceptable risk to bees,' said a spokesperson.

(Guardian - full article with links)

Posted August 6, 2010
// 0 Comments

A Universe "Inside Every Black Hole"

Using an adaptation of Einstein's general theory of relativity, Nikodem Poplawski, of Indiana University, Bloomington, analysed the theoretical motion of particles entering a black hole.

He concluded that it was possible for a whole new universe to exist inside every black hole, which could mean that our own universe could be inside a black hole as well.

"Maybe the huge black holes at the centre of the Milky Way and other galaxies are bridges to different universes," he told New Scientist.

Explaining his theory in the journal Physics Letters B, he said he used the Einstein-Cartan-Kibble-Sciama (ECKS) theory of gravity, in his analysis to account for the angular momentum of particles in a black hole. Doing this it made it possible to calculate a quality of space-time called torsion, a property believed to repel gravity.

He says instead of matter reaching infinite density in a black hole called "singularities" in Einstein's theory of relativity - the behaviour of the space-time acts more like a spring being compressed with matter rebounding and expanding continuously.

Dr Poplawski explains that this "bounce-back" effect is caused by the torsion of space-time having a repulsive force against the gargantuan strength of gravity in a black hole.

Dr Poplawski also claims that this recoiling effect could be what has led to our expanding universe that we observe today and could explain why our universe is flat, homogeneous and isotropic without needing cosmic inflation.

It is hard to see how we could test whether or not Dr Poplawski's theory is correct; the force of gravity in black holes is such that nothing can escape, so no information about what is going on inside one can ever reach us.

However, according to Dr Poplawski, if we were living in a spinning black hole then the spin would transfer to the space-time inside, meaning the universe would have a preferred direction - something we would be able to measure. Such a preferred direction could be related to the observed imbalance of matter and anti-matter in the universe and could explain the oscillation of neutrinos.

(Telegraph)

Posted August 3, 2010
// 0 Comments

Massive Undersea River Discovered Flowing on Sea Bed


Researchers working in the Black Sea have found currents of water 350 times greater than the River Thames flowing along the sea bed, carving out channels much like a river on the land.

The undersea river, which is up to 115ft deep in places, even has rapids and waterfalls much like its terrestrial equivalents.


If found on land, scientists estimate it would be the world's sixth largest river in terms of the amount of water flowing through it.

The discovery could help explain how life manages to survive in the deep ocean far out to sea away from the nutrient rich waters that are found close to land, as the rivers carry sediment and nutrients with them.

The scientists, based at the University of Leeds, used a robotic submarine to study for the first time a deep channel that had been found on the sea bed.

They found a river of highly salty water flowing along the deep channel at the bottom of the Black Sea, creating river banks and flood plains much like a river found on land.

Dr Dan Parsons, from the university's school of earth and environment, said: "The water in the channels is denser than the surrounding seawater because it has higher salinity and is carrying so much sediment.

"It flows down the sea shelf and out into the abyssal plain much like a river on land. The abyssal plains of our oceans are like the deserts of the marine world, but these channels can deliver nutrients and ingredients needed for life out over these deserts.

"This means they could be vitally important, like arteries providing life to the deep ocean.

"The key difference we found from terrestrial rivers was that as the flow goes round the bend, the water spirals in the opposite way to rivers on land."

The undersea river discovered by Dr Parsons and his colleagues, which is yet to be named, stems from salty water spilling through the Bosphorus Strait from the Mediterranean into the Black Sea, where the water has a lower salt content.

This causes the dense water from the Mediterranean to flow like a river along the sea bed, carving a channel with banks around 115 feet deep and 0.6 of a mile wide. It is the only active undersea river to have been found so far.

Scientists have long suspected they can form, after sonar scans of the sea bed have revealed meandering channels in many of the world's oceans, although none have been found before to be have currents of water flowing through them.

Among the largest of these channels is off the coast of Brazil where the Amazon enters the Atlantic Ocean.

Most are believed to have formed when sea levels were much lower and the channels have been found to be up to 2,500 miles long and be several miles wide.

The channel in the Black Sea, although much smaller, is the only one to be found still flowing and proves that these mysterious channels are formed by underwater rivers.

Unlike ocean trenches, which are geological formations that form at the deepest parts of the ocean due to movements of the tectonic plates, the undersea river channels meander like rivers on land and form banks in the same way by eroding the silt from the bottom of the channel and building it up at the edges.

Dr Parsons found that the Black Sea river is flowing at around four miles per hour with 22,000 cubic metres of water passing through the channel every second - 350 times greater than the flow of the Thames and 10 times greater than Europe's biggest river, the Rhine.

The Black Sea river flows only for around 37 miles until it reaches the edge of the sea shelf and dissipates into the deep sea.

Dr Parsons said data from the research will also be important for oil companies looking to drill in areas where these rivers exist.

He said: "This is the first time we have been able to show that there is a flow through a natural channel system and take direct measurements of what the flow is like and how that is linked to the shape and morphology of the channel."

(Telegraph)

Posted August 1, 2010
// 0 Comments

Marine Life Flees Deepwater Horizon Methane "Deadzones"

Scientists are confronting growing evidence that BP's ruptured well in the Gulf of Mexico is creating oxygen-depleted "dead zones" where fish and other marine life cannot survive.

In two separate research voyages, independent scientists have detected what were described as "astonishingly high" levels of methane, or natural gas, bubbling from the well site, setting off a chain of reactions that suck the oxygen out of the water. In some cases, methane concentrations are 100,000 times normal levels.

Other scientists as well as sport fishermen are reporting unusual movements of fish, shrimp, crab and other marine life, including increased shark sightings closer to the Alabama coast.

Larry Crowder, a marine biologist at Duke University, said there were already signs that fish were being driven from their habitat.

"The animals are already voting with their fins to get away from where the oil spill is and where potentially there is oxygen depletion," he said. "When you begin to see animals changing their distribution that is telling you about the quality of water further offshore. Basically, the fish are moving closer to shore to try to get to better water."

Such sightings - and an accumulation of data from the site of the ruptured well and from the ocean depths miles away - have deepened concerns that the enormity of the environmental disaster in the Gulf has yet to be fully understood. It could also jeopardise the Gulf's billion-dollar fishing and shrimping industry.

In a conference call with reporters, Samantha Joye, a scientist at the University of Georgia who has been studying the effects of the spill at depth, said the ruptured well was producing up to 50% as much methane and other gases as oil.

The finding presents a new challenge to scientists who so far have been focused on studying the effects on the Gulf of crude oil, and the 5.7m litres of chemical dispersants used to break up the slick.

(Guardian - full article)

Posted June 30, 2010
// 0 Comments

Bee Decline 'Due to Pesticide Cocktail'

A cocktail of chemicals from pesticides could be damaging the brains of British bees, according to scientists about to embark on a study into why the populations of the insects have dropped so rapidly in recent decades. By affecting the way bees' brains work, the pesticides might be affecting the ability of bees to find food or communicate with others in their colonies.

Neuroscientists at Dundee University, Royal Holloway and University College London will investigate the hypothesis as part of a £10m research programme launched today aimed at finding ways to stop the decline in the numbers of bees and other insect pollinators in the UK.

Insects such as bees, moths and hoverflies pollinate around a third of the agricultural crops grown around the world. If all of the UK's insect pollinators were wiped out, the drop in crop production would cost the UK economy up to £440m a year, equivalent to around 13% of the UK's income from farming.

Pollinators are also crucial for the quality of fruits and vegetables. Perfectly shaped strawberries, for example, are created only if every single ovary has been pollinated by an insect. And the number of seeds in a pumpkin depends on the number of species of insects that have pollinated the plants. "If you've got 10 pollinators, you'll get more seeds in the pumpkin than you would have got if you've just got one pollinator," said Giles Budge of the Food and Environment Research Agency. "It is important to have that diversity in a pollinating population."

According to the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, three of the 25 British species of bumblebees are already extinct and half of the remainder have shown serious declines, often up to 70%, since around the 1970s. In addition, around 75% of all butterfly species in the UK have been shown to be in decline. The new £10m Insect Pollinators Initiative (IPI), the largest programme to date of its kind, will look at the multiple reasons thought to be behind this devastation in insect population.

(Guardian)

Posted June 22, 2010
// 0 Comments

Saving Species More Important Than Climate Change

In every corner of the globe the evidence of the global biodiversity crisis is now impossible to ignore.

The economic case for global action to stop the destruction of the natural world is even more powerful than the argument for tackling climate change, a major report for the United Nations will declare this summer.

The Stern report on climate change, which was prepared for the UK Treasury and published in 2007, famously claimed that the cost of limiting climate change would be around 1%-2% of annual global wealth, but the longer-term economic benefits would be 5-20 times that figure.

The UN's biodiversity report - dubbed the Stern for Nature - is expected to say that the value of saving "natural goods and services", such as pollination, medicines, fertile soils, clean air and water, will be even higher - between 10 and 100 times the cost of saving the habitats and species which provide them.

In the UK, a third of high priority species and two thirds of habitats are declining, according to government figures that emerged today on the UK's Biodiversity Action Plan. Since 1994 despite the extra attention provided by the plan, 5% of the species it covered are thought to have gone extinct.

Around the world the picture is as bad or worse: the International Union for the Conservation of Nature believes one in five mammals, one in three amphibians and one in seven birds are extinct or globally threatened, and other species groups still being assessed are showing similar patterns.

Simon Stuart, a senior IUCN scientist, has warned that for the first time since the dinosaurs humans are driving plants and animals to extinction faster than new species can evolve.

For decades, nature lovers have watched the fens being drained, or noticed the decline of cuckoos in spring and butterflies in summer. But until recently these changes have been overshadowed by growing fears about the impact of climate change.

However, as the impact of these species losses around the world have mounted - riots over food shortages, costly floods and landslides, expensive bills for cleaning polluted water, and many more disasters - attention has finally started to turn to the impact of human beings literally consuming the planet's natural resources.

(Guardian - read full article)

Posted May 21, 2010
// 0 Comments